#Ansys aim software

Multiphysics simulation often involves the use of multiple simulation tools. ANSYS AIM solves this by give the design engineer a tool they can pick up and use, but that also gives them access to the most capable solvers on the market. The math is the same, but it is not as detailed or accurate. Programs for that group of users have usually been so watered down or lack so much functionality, that they simply deliver a quick answer. 2) No more вЂњgood enoughвЂќ simulation done by Design EngineersД®ase of use and training issue has kept robust simulation tools out of the hands of design engineers. This experience was used to make sure the same thing does not happen in ANSYS AIM. Others have tried this in the past, but the workflows were either too rigid or not able to capture complex simulations. This is amplified by tools that allow users, not just programmers, to create templates, capturing the preferred steps for a given type of simulation. The workflow in ANSYS AIM is process oriented from the beginning, which is a key step in standardizing processes. 1) Standardized processes across an organization And here are the seven way we predict you will be doing things differently.

#Ansys aim software

Changing the Way Simulation is DoneД«efore we list where we see things changing, letвЂ™s repeat that list of what AIM brings to the table, because those key deliverables in the software are what are driving the change:Д®ach of these on their own would be good, but together, they allow a fundamental shift in how a simulation tool can be used. But from the ground up it is an environment that enables productivity, processes, ease-of-use, collaboration, and automation. It is built on top of these same world class best-in-bread solvers. Instead of one new way of doing something or a new breakthrough feature, it is more of a product that puts everything together to deliver a step change in productivity. Putting it all Together in One PlaceДЄNSYS AIM is, among many other things, an answer to this need. Why? They want more engineers to have access to these great tools and they also want people to be working together more with less specialization. But if you talk to their managers or methods engineers, you find less happiness. They are all best-in-breed advanced tools for doing a certain type of physical simulation. Insert your tool of choice, it doesnвЂ™t really matter. ANSYS Mechanical for structural, ANSYS Fluent for fluids, and maybe ANSYS HFSS for electromagnetics. Right now everyone is happily working away in their tool of choice, simulating their physics of choice. And of course HPC improvements on the solver side. Then more recently, robust CFD meshing of dirty geometry. Then came robust 3D tetrahedral meshing, which we coasted on for a while until fully associative and parametric CAD connections made another giant step forward in productivity and simulation accuracy. GUIвЂ™s on solvers was the first big change I saw. If you have been doing simulation as long as I have (29 years for me) you have heard it before. It enablesВ the type of change that will drive down schedule time and cost for product development, and allow companies to use simulation more effectively to drive their product development towards better performance and robustness. A bold statement, but after PADT has used the tool here, and worked with customers who are using it, we feel confident that this is a software package will drive that level of change. released their ANSYS AIM product they didnвЂ™t just introduce a better way to do simulation, they introduced a tool that will change the way we all do simulation.